Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:57 pm
mredle wrote:hilltopalum wrote:not too much to report as of right now. Coaches turning focus toward season right now. Hoping for Clarke, after that it gets a bit thin
I love the "all in" quality of the coaches decision with respect to Clarke. If we get him we have a great recruiting class in the fall. If not, we don't panic, we assess options and plan and set the table for the spring.
Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:39 pm
mredle wrote:hilltopalum wrote:not too much to report as of right now. Coaches turning focus toward season right now. Hoping for Clarke, after that it gets a bit thin
I love the "all in" quality of the coaches decision with respect to Clarke.
Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:00 pm
taa71458 wrote:mredle wrote:hilltopalum wrote:not too much to report as of right now. Coaches turning focus toward season right now. Hoping for Clarke, after that it gets a bit thin
I love the "all in" quality of the coaches decision with respect to Clarke.
Its not like we really have any other option besides that right now
Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:13 pm
TrueBlueJay wrote:
I disagree - we could probably have many more options, but the point is that we are raising the bar and not settling.
Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:07 pm
gtmoBlue wrote:Disagree: there are plenty of Top 150 recruits still on the boards. Not counting kids in the Top 30, there are 21 uncommitted Rivals 150 guys. There will be approx 600-800 transfers next Spring, as well. The coaching staff has plenty of options available and with season starting in less than a month, this is as good a time as any for a pause.
Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:29 pm
Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:10 pm
Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:41 pm
mredle wrote:Bottom line is that many of us have been suggesting various players that we might go after in place of Clarke, some of which have received attention from our coaching staff at one time or the other. Yet our coaches have not gone in that direction. It may be that we are thinking of the crop of transfers who may be available or JC players but do you pass on players that can actually play that you would have for four years? No. I think our coaches are looking for a certain level of player and they aren't willing to sign a lesser player just to mollify us.
Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:22 pm