Transfers 2017

Keep updated on possible future Bluejays.

Return to Recruiting

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby Jet915 » Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:26 am

fritzpointer wrote:Brady Ernst has reopened his recruitment. Would have 3 year to play. I know we watch him a lot in high school.


Looks like a big bodied center we could use.
Image
Jet915
 
Posts: 4694
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:11 pm

 

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby TrueBlueJay » Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:46 am

While reading up on Brady, came across this Pulitzer Prize winning piece.

Brady Ernst, a 6-8 power forward from Indian Hills CC re-opened his recruitment at around 6pm tonight. In this season at IHCC he averaged 9.4/6.5/0.4 on .637/.000/.726 shooting. The 6’10”, 230-pound post would have had three years of eligibility remaining when he got to Xavier, but now will take that elsewhere.
User avatar
TrueBlueJay
 
Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:26 am

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby CURx » Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:01 am

TrueBlueJay wrote:While reading up on Brady, came across this Pulitzer Prize winning piece.

Brady Ernst, a 6-8 power forward from Indian Hills CC re-opened his recruitment at around 6pm tonight. In this season at IHCC he averaged 9.4/6.5/0.4 on .637/.000/.726 shooting. The 6’10”, 230-pound post would have had three years of eligibility remaining when he got to Xavier, but now will take that elsewhere.


Wait! Did the Germans just bomb Pearl Harbor?
CURx
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:35 am

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby hilltopalum » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:50 am

Jarreau and Gresham hit the market last night. I think these are two players Creighton was hoping would be available and a pair that they will for sure go after. They've been a duo since high school. It will be interesting to see if they stick together during this move. Jays liked both but scholarship crunch could be an issue. 2 spots are likely reserved for Donnal (or a big) and top freshman available (Bowen or Waters). If Jays strike out on one or both I believe Jarreau and Gresham are their top targets, especially since Murphy's role is more pronounced on Hilltop.
User avatar
hilltopalum
 
Posts: 2030
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:42 am

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby bluejayfan00 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:58 am

hilltopalum wrote:Jarreau and Gresham hit the market last night. I think these are two players Creighton was hoping would be available and a pair that they will for sure go after. They've been a duo since high school. It will be interesting to see if they stick together during this move. Jays liked both but scholarship crunch could be an issue. 2 spots are likely reserved for Donnal (or a big) and top freshman available (Bowen or Waters). If Jays strike out on one or both I believe Jarreau and Gresham are their top targets, especially since Murphy's role is more pronounced on Hilltop.

All that sounds great, but the longer Tug's takes, the more it'll suck if he doesn't choose us. There are a lot of nice transfers out there, like Jarreau and Gresham.
Creighton 18'
User avatar
bluejayfan00
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:52 pm

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby hilltopalum » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:03 am

bluejayfan00 wrote:All that sounds great, but the longer Tug's takes, the more it'll suck if he doesn't choose us. There are a lot of nice transfers out there, like Jarreau and Gresham.



sounds to me the like the Jays have good options then. Always want your program to be a buyer at this time and not the seller.
User avatar
hilltopalum
 
Posts: 2030
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:42 am

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby bluejayfan00 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:05 am

hilltopalum wrote:
bluejayfan00 wrote:All that sounds great, but the longer Tug's takes, the more it'll suck if he doesn't choose us. There are a lot of nice transfers out there, like Jarreau and Gresham.



sounds to me the like the Jays have good options then. Always want your program to be a buyer at this time and not the seller.

What I'm saying is, I hope that all of our other targets don't look elsewhere because we don't have a Tugs decision yet.
Creighton 18'
User avatar
bluejayfan00
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:52 pm

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby #RollJays » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:37 am

bluejayfan00 wrote:
hilltopalum wrote:
bluejayfan00 wrote:All that sounds great, but the longer Tug's takes, the more it'll suck if he doesn't choose us. There are a lot of nice transfers out there, like Jarreau and Gresham.



sounds to me the like the Jays have good options then. Always want your program to be a buyer at this time and not the seller.

What I'm saying is, I hope that all of our other targets don't look elsewhere because we don't have a Tugs decision yet.

We have room for Tugs no matter what.
#RollJays
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:16 pm

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby hilltopalum » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:43 am

bluejayfan00 wrote:
hilltopalum wrote:
bluejayfan00 wrote:All that sounds great, but the longer Tug's takes, the more it'll suck if he doesn't choose us. There are a lot of nice transfers out there, like Jarreau and Gresham.



sounds to me the like the Jays have good options then. Always want your program to be a buyer at this time and not the seller.

What I'm saying is, I hope that all of our other targets don't look elsewhere because we don't have a Tugs decision yet.



Tugs deciding between MSU, Arizona and Creighton makes Creighton look all that more appealing. I don't think Tugs' recruitment will drive away top players.
User avatar
hilltopalum
 
Posts: 2030
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:42 am

Re: Transfers 2017

Postby bluejayfan00 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:50 am

I agree with that. Point is, longer Tugs takes to decide, less time we have to go after other guys, more time for other schools to build relationships.
Creighton 18'
User avatar
bluejayfan00
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:52 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Recruiting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests