Realhoops wrote:I don't remember the last time I was this conflicted -- Nebraska vs. Illinois.
Feels like a Nebraska win probably helps our metrics a bit because of our blowout of them in Lincoln.
Feels like a Nebraska win helps out our lock on a three seed and maybe positioning amongst the three seeds because Illinois is right in there with us.
But -- a Nebraska win means a Nebraska win, and I'm just not able to want that without throwing up in my mouth.
EDIT: So far in the first half, Mast is going all Eric Dixon and bombing threes and providing Nebraska's only reliable scoring, but Illinois does not seem to have a clue how to defend him. Illinois also looks terrible on the offensive end so far just chucking up contested threes and missing.
.Realhoops wrote:I don't remember the last time I was this conflicted -- Nebraska vs. Illinois.
Feels like a Nebraska win probably helps our metrics a bit because of our blowout of them in Lincoln.
Feels like a Nebraska win helps out our lock on a three seed and maybe positioning amongst the three seeds because Illinois is right in there with us.
But -- a Nebraska win means a Nebraska win, and I'm just not able to want that without throwing up in my mouth.
EDIT: So far in the first half, Mast is going all Eric Dixon and bombing threes and providing Nebraska's only reliable scoring, but Illinois does not seem to have a clue how to defend him. Illinois also looks terrible on the offensive end so far just chucking up contested threes and missing.
jaysfan3 wrote:Realhoops wrote:I don't remember the last time I was this conflicted -- Nebraska vs. Illinois.
Feels like a Nebraska win probably helps our metrics a bit because of our blowout of them in Lincoln.
Feels like a Nebraska win helps out our lock on a three seed and maybe positioning amongst the three seeds because Illinois is right in there with us.
But -- a Nebraska win means a Nebraska win, and I'm just not able to want that without throwing up in my mouth.
EDIT: So far in the first half, Mast is going all Eric Dixon and bombing threes and providing Nebraska's only reliable scoring, but Illinois does not seem to have a clue how to defend him. Illinois also looks terrible on the offensive end so far just chucking up contested threes and missing.
I don’t think this game is going to affect us as all. We are probably locked into a 3 seed.
Jaybird wrote:.Realhoops wrote:I don't remember the last time I was this conflicted -- Nebraska vs. Illinois.
Feels like a Nebraska win probably helps our metrics a bit because of our blowout of them in Lincoln.
Feels like a Nebraska win helps out our lock on a three seed and maybe positioning amongst the three seeds because Illinois is right in there with us.
But -- a Nebraska win means a Nebraska win, and I'm just not able to want that without throwing up in my mouth.
EDIT: So far in the first half, Mast is going all Eric Dixon and bombing threes and providing Nebraska's only reliable scoring, but Illinois does not seem to have a clue how to defend him. Illinois also looks terrible on the offensive end so far just chucking up contested threes and missing.
I’m with you. But, bright side, they might be playing their way into a 7. Normally, I’d hate that, but if A&M can land a 10, which looks increasingly possible, then that could be a 1st round matchup. Maybe even Marquette would get winners.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 194 guests