drbluejay wrote:Thanks jayball, I'm glad someone sees the BIT of depth I was talking about if Patton stays.
I'm more concerned w/ PG play if Patton returns.
Realhoops wrote:drbluejay wrote:Thanks jayball, I'm glad someone sees the BIT of depth I was talking about if Patton stays.
I'm more concerned w/ PG play if Patton returns.
This is an April Fools' post, right?
vivid_dude wrote:Realhoops wrote:drbluejay wrote:Epperson had a nice game yesterday.
I like what I see but I'm hoping Patton stays and Epperson redshirts to put on some weight. We have a bit of depth behind Patton w/ veteran players and redshirting gives Epperson the best chance to add that weight just like Patton did. If Patton leaves, Epperson might have to be thrown into the fire a bit soon.
We have depth behind Patton?
I'm very interested in hearing drbluejay defend this statement. Because my opinion, which is shaped by watching basketball, is that frontcourt depth is the biggest issue Creighton has for 2017-2018...even if Patton comes back. Without Patton, it's a glaring, borderline insurmountable weakness.
Jet915 wrote:Post championiship article w/some quotes from Epperson.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/basketball/la-lumiere-featuring-four-australians-defeats-montverde-to-win-dicks-high-school-national-championship/news-story/e493ae09670b223e31090865592da093
Without Patton, it's a glaring, borderline insurmountable weakness.
Little dramatic and harsh don't you think? Like, why bother to lace 'em up... Unless, of course, your only accepted idea to overcome something "insurmountable" is to win the NCAA tourney, then, ok, I guess you have a point.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 85 guests